From 94be35f1ddfdc1ead8f04760eb846498224f17e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mika Seeartea Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:44:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] aaa --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 3043e55..bc36f37 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Now there are some things that I had to consider before choosing this, First of + Not truly free software + Hard to backup and update without breaking things

- +[//]: # (Hello) Vaultwarden is basically a rust based replacement to bitwardens server side that works with bitwardens clients, This way I have the broad client support and the fact that it can run in a CT without issues makes it more suitable for my needs.

In terms of data safety I am confident enough that there should not be any major dataloss that could acure due to the fact that in the 5 years of running 512mb (and its soon to be more stable brother adastra7) I've never lost data of any critical services thanks to those being backed up in multiple offsite locations (which also store both a server with the HDD's in it and cold storage)